Corporate Greed, Political, Union

Right-to-work goes down in flames in Illinois House with zero yes votes

Gov. Bruce Rauner’s desires to have right-to-work in Illinois went down in flames in the House on Thursday, gaining zero yes votes in a fiery debate Democrats aimed squarely at the governor.

The vote tally was 0 yes votes, 72 no votes and 37 voting present, offering a blistering rebuke to Rauner’s anti-union agenda. A handful of Republicans went for a walk during the vote, not publicly falling on one side or another.

Republicans dismissed the vote as political theater even as Democrats pit workers’ rights against corporate greed and called Rauner “divisive” for touring the state and essentially asking local towns to kick unions out.

“Don’t be afraid, stay with us, vote no!” state Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Belleville, said.
Illinois House Republican Leader Jim Durkin, R-Western Springs, lambasted Democrats for moving what he said amounted to “sham bills” in the House. The legislation voted on Thursday was not drafted by the governor’s office. Last week, Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan had urged Rauner to give him language for a bill, needling Rauner that he had talked about right-to-work for 100 days.

“What’s happening today, what happened last week really is a disservice to this body, to this chamber and to this building,” Durkin said. “I’m embarrassed to be part of this process today. I think this is a very dark moment in this body’s chamber.”

Rauner’s office countered that Madigan and Democrats were walking away from the negotiating table by plucking out controversial issues and voting them down. In the Capitol on Thursday, Rauner dismissed the notion that a vote on right-to-work was meant to embarrass the governor, who has made it his marquee issue since he was sworn into office in January.
head to Springfield)

Asked whether the vote on right-to-work — which essentially allows people to work in union jobs without paying union dues — was meant to embarrass him, Rauner said: “Difficult negotiations in government often involve political theater. That’s a little bit of what that is. I don’t take it that way. This is just part of a political process. We’re working together and we’ll get through it. . . . There’s a lot of pressure from special-interest groups who don’t want to change. We are in a long slow decline we need to grow pretty strongly . . . we are encouraging Republicans to stay strong together. We’re a super-minority.”

Action, Corporate Greed, Political

Well Said

The Republicans talk about running in 2016 on a platform of bolstering the American middle- and working-classes.

And then they pass a political document posing as a budget that engages deep cuts in the very things that would bolster the American middle- and working-classes: (1) Cuts to both Medicare and Medicaid, (2) cuts in higher education funding, (3) cuts in basic education funding, (4) cuts in infrastructure spending (no private sector industry is more expansionary to the economy or creative of more jobs than the construction industry, which has the longest food chain in the private sector; furthermore, the manufacturing and transportation sectors are already showing the negative effects of our unwillingness to do anything about our crumbling infrastructure), (5) continued efforts to do away with the ACA.

Most ironic of all is the fact that, after cutting those areas that expand the economy and create jobs, they want to raise defense spending—which has the largest percentage of fraud of any arena of government spending—by $38 billion just in the non-war account (which allows them discretion to raise the combat operations account “as needed”). Sorry, but that defense spending doesn’t provide widespread gains for middle- and working-class folks.

Rusty Inman

UPS driver information