Alice Rivlin Admits Chained CPI Is A Benefit Cut To Social Security — But Loves It Anyway




Alice the Malice Rivlin went on with Andrea Mitchell yesterday to discuss the boring sequester debate and, as usual, she trumpets what every other deficit scold in the Beltway says: Cut entitlements or adopt Simpson-Bowles. At least she admits that switching to a chained CPI is an actual cut in benefits.



Rivlin:… one thing is the reform of the consumer price index which is really a technical adjustment, but it would mean slightly lower social security benefits and other benefits going forward. Now you could offset that with other changes in the law, but it is the right thing to do and his own troops were kind of unhappy about that, but he put it out there and he has certainly put Medicare adjustments, various sorts on the table.


Now, why is cutting benefits to seniors the ‘right thing’ to do, Alice? Why do we have to pay for the Iraq and Afghanistan war and not the rich? And why do we have to pay for the financial economic collapse and not the rich, Alice? And WTF are these mythical offsets to draconian cuts to Social Security that she speaks of? Is she talking about the proposed ‘birthday bump? That’s really a horseshit thing to do.


And it doesn’t cover anything for like twenty years after you retire, which won’t help many people since only the wealthy have seen an increase in life expectancy.



Some propose adopting the chained CPI with an added “birthday bump” – a 1
percent benefit increase for each of years 20 to 24 after initial retirement eligibility. But this supposed “sweetener” only affects those who live until becoming eligible for the birthday bump. Wealthier seniors live longer than their lower-income counterparts, so the “birthday bump” does not adequately protect those who need Social Security benefits the most. Even with it, the birthday bump does not fully compensate for the cut the chained CPI entails.


Digby explains in detail how the chained CPI hurts seniors moving forward.



The problem is not that their private pensions run out. (Not very many people have private pensions anymore.) The problem is that the Chained-CPI reduces the cost of living adjustment down by 0.3 percentage points annually. That translates into a cut in benefits of 3 percent for those who have been retired ten years, 6 percent after 20 years, and 9 percent after 30 years.


The people who have been retired the longest and are, therefore, the poorest, will see the largest cuts. A 1% “bump” isn’t going to make much of a difference. This is a cut. And it’s substantial. It will affect the poor the most and it’s going to take a lot more than “tweaking” to make up for it. Moreover, it’s not just the poorest of the poor who will be affected. There seems to be some belief in Washington circles that 70-year-olds who are living on 25k- 35k a year won’t feel a cut in their incomes, which just goes to show how distant they are from the way people really live.


And why bring in Social Security at all, since it has nothing to do with the federal deficit? The GOP needs its pound of flesh from the working class, but the Beltway never asks them why? Why be so f*&king cruel and inhumane? I wish we lived in the Land of Oz and we could throw water on the Fix The Debt and Alice Rivkin assholes of the world so that they would all melt away for good.


The entire Beltway cable TV establishment never has on any liberal members of Congress or any other proponents that are against cutting safety net benefits –except when they want a Crossfire-style formatted segment with another deficit scold.
(h/t Scarce for the video)

Teamsters float contract outline to UPS as talks race to meet unofficial March-end deadline


Investment firm says UPS shippers ready to move to FedEx next month.

The Teamsters Union over the weekend disclosed for the first time the broad strokes of a contract proposal made to UPS Inc., as the company races to ink a tentative pact with the union by month’s end to avoid possible shipper defections to rival FedEx Corp.


Ken Hall, director of the union’s package division, outlined the Teamsters proposal, which calls for a five-year contract, in a national conference call Saturday with UPS shop stewards. All UPS Teamsters would receive a $1-per-hour wage increase in each year of the contract and a $1.50-per-hour annual increase from current levels to cover pension and health benefits. The current contract, signed in 2007, calls for a $1 an hour annual increase in the company’s contribution benefits.


The union proposal also calls for the creation of an undefined number of so-called “22.3 jobs” in each year of the contract. Those jobs are named after the article in the 1997 agreement reached after the Teamsters shut down UPS that summer with a 15-day strike. The language of the article required the company to create 20,000 full-time jobs between 1998 and 2008 by combining part-time positions into full-time work. The Teamsters, and in particular the dissident group Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), have said UPS has not done all that it could to create that many full-time positions.


The proposal would increase the starting pay for part-timers to $15 an hour from the current $8.50 an hour. The union will not accept any contract offer calling for active members to pay premiums on their health insurance.


The contents of Hall’s proposal were contained in a communiqué by TDU issued soon after the conference call ended.


TDU said in the communiqué that Hall reviewed a “series of tentative agreements” relating to the company’s “SurePost” program with the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). Under the program, UPS transports packages—mostly merchandise ordered online—deep into the USPS physical network, where it is delivered the “last mile” to the final destination by letter carrier. The program is offered at low cost to retailers and e-tailers and has been a successful revenue-generator. However, the Teamsters have long complained that SurePost takes business away from UPS drivers.


One of the proposals, according to TDU, would require that all SurePost parcels weighing more than 10 pounds or wider than 3 feet would be delivered by a UPS driver. Hall said a program called “SurePost Redirect,” where UPS uses technology to reroute SurePost packages to the UPS system and away from the Post Office, has resulted in 20 percent of all SurePost shipments moved by UPS drivers.


UPS did not return a request for comment. The Teamsters declined to comment on Hall’s proposal or even confirm that he had made one. It is believed UPS is seeking a seven-year contract, which the union does not favor.


The current agreement expires at the end of July, and both sides have been negotiating on and off since September with the goal of announcing a tentative agreement by the end of March. In its weekly “Friday Freight” column published March 22, investment firm Wolfe Trahan said it was told by an unidentified Teamster source that it’s unlikely a tentative deal will be struck by the end of March due to the complications surrounding the health care discussions. However, the contact expressed confidence that a deal will get done long before July.


The firm also said it’s been told by some shippers they would accelerate shifts in volumes to FedEx starting next month if a tentative deal isn’t reached by March 31. Ed Wolfe, a long-time transport analyst and co-founder of the firm, surmised that diversion is already occurring. Wolfe noted that FedEx reported a 15-percent year-over-year increase in ground volumes in its fiscal third quarter that ended in February. That compares to year-over-year gains of 11 and 8 percent, respectively, in the prior two fiscal quarters, he said.


The volume figures include shipments generated by FedEx’s own initiative with the USPS, called “SmartPost.”


A FedEx spokeswoman declined comment.

DC Velocity

Fox News too “liberal” for Tea Party

Try to read this without laughing……….

7NEWS

The Tea Party boycotted Fox News for the second time this month, saying the cable network is too liberal.


Tea Party members organized the second boycott of Fox News from Thursday, March 21 at 6 a.m. through Sunday, March 24 at 6 a.m. because they say the channel “turned Left,” according to the blog Benghazi Truth.


The blog alleges that the Obama administration organized a media-supported “cover-up” of the events surrounding the 2012 attacks on an American diplomatic mission at Benghazi in Libya.


Fox News has a reputation of representing a conservative perspective on political issues.


Written primarily by Frank M. Davis, Jr., a Tea Party supporter, the blog helped to organize and promote both boycotts. Kathy Amidon, a Tea Party activist from Nashville, Tenn., is also a driving force behind the boycotts.


The first boycott began Friday, March 8 and lasted through March 9.


A post on Benghazi Truth on Saturday says that the group “will rally over 1 million people to boycott FOX until it TURNS RIGHT, or until… everyone just walks away from the smoldering ash-heap that was once ‘Fair and Balanced.'”


The group’s boycott is focused solely on Fox News.


“FOX needs the Tea Party/conservatives more than the conservatives need FOX after FOX turned left, basically selling out the people who made FOX successful in an attempt to earn an extra buck,” a post on the blog reads. “FOX is extremely vulnerable to these boycotts while the rest of the (mainstream media) doesn’t need us at all, to speak of.”


Stan Hjerleid of Fort Collins, Colo. posted a “Guest Daily Memo” on Benghazi Truth on Mar. 13 explaining why Tea Party supporters like himself are boycotting Fox News.


Hjerleid’s blog post alleges that media outlets are using techniques “used by Hitler” in order to “indoctrinate the masses.”


The post specifically criticizes Sean Hannity for his TV special “Benghazi: 6 Months Of Deceit,” saying that the program included “absolutely nothing new on Benghazi.”


Hjerleid writes that “we need to be careful what we see and hear” on the news.


“If we keep silent about (Fox News’) shortcomings, then they can get away with shading their coverage further Left,” Hjerleid writes. “I for one oppose that. They can make adjustments or I will get my news elsewhere.”


Contract Negotiations





















UPS Talks Get Hazy on Healthcare


Ken Hall says the Union is working on “creative solutions” on healthcare as contract negotiations resume in Florida.


The International Union held rallies nationwide to draw a firm line against Teamsters paying toward our healthcare.


Ken Hall even threatened to walk away from the bargaining table if UPS didn’t withdraw its proposals that Teamsters pay for our healthcare.


The Company’s proposals are still on the table, however, as bargaining continues. And Hall has reported that the Teamster National Negotiating committee is “working hard to come up with creative solutions.”


Hall didn’t elaborate on what kind of “creative solutions” in his report to local unions.


Teamsters members are not expected to pay a cent toward their health insurance premiums in the new contract. But Hall could be negotiating coverage changes for active and retired UPSers in company Health Plans.


Increases in the cost for retiree healthcare in these plans are also expected.


Harassment


Hall reports that the Committee told UPS that they will not be able to move forward on negotiations without movement from the company on harassment issues.


But the Union did move forward and put economic proposals on the table for the first time. The International Union still has not told the members what harassment proposals are on the table or what the Union is fighting for to:
    
protect drivers from harassment and discipline from UPS technology
            
strengthen 9.5 rights so drivers’ loads are adjusted
                   
require UPS to hire additional drivers in centers where more drivers are needed to reduce excessive loads and unwanted, excessive overtime
                            
other harassment issues

Economic Proposals


The International Union has put its initial economic proposals on the table, including substantial increases in benefit contributions.


Also on the table is an increase in starting pay for part-time workers. There is still no word on wage increases for current part-timers.


The last time the starting wage went up for part-timers in 1997, existing part-timers got an extra $1 wage increase to narrow the gap between part-time and full-time wages. That gap is bigger today than ever.


Bargaining Timeline


Negotiations will be held in St. Petersburg Florida through Thursday and are scheduled to continue through the end of the month.


Tentative agreements have been reached on many supplements, including some of the larger ones, but many remain unsettled.


The information Brownout on what’s in these deals continues—even where supplemental negotiations are completed.


Click here to read the negotiations update Ken Hall sent to UPS and UPS Freight locals.


 






UPS driver information