Category Archives: Union

Unions 101: How to explain and defend unions to anti-union jerks

Our friends at American Rights at Work have a handy two-pager that explains what unions do. We condensed it a little bit. Keep it in your pocket and use it to argue with that biased relative at the dinner table.

Unions are democratic organizations whose leaders and rules are chosen by members.
A union is an organization of two or more employees who band together to bargain with their employer over hours, pay and working conditions.

Leaders are elected. Members draft and ratify constitutions that guide the union.

Unions represent all employees whether they pay dues or not.
Unions are required by law to represent the interests of all employees whether they pay union dues or not. They bargain with employers over contracts to establish pay, benefits and working conditions. They represent employees in disciplinary processes, lobby for laws that help working families and offer member benefits and fellowship. Union members help each other and their communities.

Unions are needed now more than ever.
If it weren’t for unions, there would be no minimum wage, no eight-hour work day, no child labor laws, no health and safety standards, and no weekends. Extremist anti-worker politicians and powerful corporations are trying to roll back those standards and destroy Social Security and Medicare. Unions are the only group standing between them and workers.

No country has a middle class that doesn’t have unions. Unions raise wages, benefits and standards for all workers in an industry.

Without unions, employees have no rights in the workplace.
Without a union, employees have no rights in U.S. workplaces unless they belong to a class protected by equal opportunity laws or labor laws. In most states, employers can fire workers because they don’t like the color of their eyes.

Collective bargaining brings fairness to the workplace.
Collective bargaining agreements are legally enforceable contracts to which employers and employees agree. They are intended to create a fair workplace by setting clear expectations for employees.

Collective bargaining agreements typically contain a clause requiring an employer to show “just cause” for disciplining and/or firing an employee. They make sure employees have a due process to defend themselves against unfair accusations by an employer.

Bad trade deals, not unions, are hurting American companies.
Bad trade deals hurt the American auto industry by giving foreign competitors an unfair advantage over U.S.-made vehicles. For example, Toyota was near bankruptcy after World War II, but the U.S. government rescued it by buying military vehicles for the Korean War effort.

Some of the country’s most successful companies have a union workforce, including: Southwest Airlines, AT&T, Costco, and UPS.

Unions raise productivity on average by up to 24 percent in manufacturing, 16 percent in hospitals, and 38 percent in construction. Union workers also have higher professional standards because they train workers.

Unions prevent jobs from going overseas.

Many collective bargaining agreements contain specific provisions that restrict the amount of work employers can outsource, helping to protect American jobs.

No worker is ever forced to join a union.
It has long been illegal to require and employee to join a union as a condition of employment. Workers may be charged a fee for union services even if they aren’t members because unions are required to represent all employees and because employers are forbidden to discriminate against non-union members.

No Rights At Work laws let government interfere with the freedom of employers and workers to bargain with each other.
These laws force employers to treat all employees the same, and they force unions to represent all members. But they allow freeloaders to take advantage of unions by not paying for the services and benefits they receive. No Rights At Work laws are aimed at destroying unions and lowering workers’ living standards.

Unions are always under attack by extremist CEOs and wealthy people.
The anti-union rhetoric you hear from extreme anti-worker politicians was bought and paid for by billionaires like the Koch brothers, Dick DeVos and the Wal-Mart heirs. They have a vast network of front groups, think tanks and paid media shills (like Glenn Beck) to smear unions.



Retiree Healthcare Cost


UPS Threatens Retiree Healthcare Hike





January 4, 2013: UPS management is flexing its muscles in bargaining. In late December they sent a notice threatening thousands of Teamster retirees in the company healthcare plan with drastic payment hikes.


UPS Teamsters need a pension increase, not a retiree healthcare hike.


Teamster retirees in the company health plan pay $50/month for individual or family coverage. But UPS is threatening to raise premiums to $247.50/month for individuals, $495 for spouse or dependent coverage, or $742.50 for family coverage.


These rates apply only to Teamster retirees in the Company plan. Many full-time UPS Teamster retirees are in Teamster plans.


The company plan cannot hike retiree healthcare costs until the contract expires in August. So why is the company sending out a notice now? It’s a bargaining tactic, plain and simple.


As part of contract negotiations, the International Union and UPS will bargain over how much Teamster retirees in the company Health Plan will pay toward their healthcare.


The company doesn’t really expect to impose the costs in its memo. By sending out a notice with inflated rates, the company is trying to soften up retirees and our negotiators to accept higher monthly premiums.


Management may want to hike monthly premiums to match what Teamster retirees in the Central States Health Plan pay: $200/month for individual coverage and $400 for spouse coverage. Central States has stated these rates will not go up over the life of the next contract.


UPS has pushed to get Teamsters into a company health plan, and they save millions because on average UPS has a younger work force than other Teamster companies. Now management wants to get the savings and also stick it to the retirees.


UPS made more than $4 billion in profits last year. They don’t need to nickel and dime the Teamsters, including retirees, who built this company.


UPS Teamsters need a pension increase, not a retiree healthcare hike.

UPS Threatens Retiree Healthcare Hike


UPS management is flexing its muscles in bargaining. In late December they sent a notice threatening thousands of Teamster retirees in the company healthcare plan with drastic payment hikes.



UPS Teamsters need a pension increase, not a retiree healthcare hike.


Teamster retirees in the company health plan pay $50/month for individual or family coverage. But UPS is threatening to raise premiums to $247.50/month for individuals, $495 for spouse or dependent coverage, or $742.50 for family coverage.


These rates apply only to Teamster retirees in the Company plan. Many full-time UPS Teamster retirees are in Teamster plans.


The company plan cannot hike retiree healthcare costs until the contract expires in August. So why is the company sending out a notice now? It’s a bargaining tactic, plain and simple.


As part of contract negotiations, the International Union and UPS will bargain over how much Teamster retirees in the company Health Plan will pay toward their healthcare.


The company doesn’t really expect to impose the costs in its memo. By sending out a notice with inflated rates, the company is trying to soften up retirees and our negotiators to accept higher monthly premiums.


Management may want to hike monthly premiums to match what Teamster retirees in the Central States Health Plan pay: $200/month for individual coverage and $400 for spouse coverage. Central States has stated these rates will not go up over the life of the next contract.


UPS has pushed to get Teamsters into a company health plan, and they save millions because on average UPS has a younger work force than other Teamster companies. Now management wants to get the savings and also stick it to the retirees.



UPS made more than $4 billion in profits last year. They don’t need to nickel and dime the Teamsters, including retirees, who built this company.


UPS Teamsters need a pension increase, not a retiree healthcare hike.


Click here to download a bulletin for UPS Teamsters.



Click here to read the company notice threatening retiree healthcare hikes.

25% Increase in Healthcare Cost for UPS Retirees

     I just recieved a notification that there will be a 25% increase in the cost to UPS retirees for their healthcare. The effective date is on August 1, 2013.
     Most of you that have retired in recent years were paying $200 per month for your healthcare. The new amount according to the letter from UPS Health and Welfare Package for Retired Employees will be increased to $247.50 per month, per person. Or $495 for you and your spouse.
     If you haven’t recieved a notification, or feel that this is in some way wrong, call your Local Union and let them know what you think.
     You can find your Local Union Number by clicking here.

The Twinkie Defense


                      Don’t blame the unions for Hostess’s downfall.

You remember the Twinkie Defense? It was a term of ridicule coined by reporters covering the 1979 San Francisco murder trial of county supervisor Dan White. The right-wing White had assassinated both fellow supervisor Harvey Milk, a heroic figure in San Francisco’s gay community, and Mayor George Moscone. Lawyers for White claimed that he overdosed on Twinkies, and was acting under the delusional influence of a sugar high.


Now, there is a new Twinkie Defense, and it is equally shameless and delusional. The Twinkie Defense is: the unions made us do it.


For those who missed it, having perhaps spent the weekend on Jupiter, the iconic Twinkie brand is on the verge of extinction. The parent company of America’s beloved junk food, Hostess Brands, has been in bankruptcy since January 2012.


In the bankruptcy proceeding, management has been leaning on the unions to go along with massive pay and benefit cuts to “save the company.” The bakers’ union, the largest at Hostess, voted by a 92-percent margin to reject the company’s demand for an immediate 8 percent pay cut. This came on top of $110 million in pay concessions given by the unions the last time Hostess was in bankruptcy.


The company and the financial press have spun this story as the makers of Twinkies going out of business because of excessive labor costs. But here’s the real story.


Hostess Brands is classic case of private equity engineers and executives looting a viable company, loading it up with debt, and then asking the employees to make up the difference.


In the 1960s and 1970s, the pre-existing company went on a buying spree, picking up some of America’ s most famous brands. It paid $330 million for Hostess. The company, then known as Interstate Bakery Holdings, was taken private in 1987, then went public again in 1991. At each step of the way, middlemen and insiders captured windfalls.


In 1995, Interstate bought Continental from Ralston Purina, giving it ownership of the precious Twinkie, as well as Ding Dong, Ho Hos, and Wonder Bread. Yet another acquisition brought Drakes Cakes into the family.


Having taken on massive debt, the company, now called Hostess Brands, declared bankruptcy in 2004. When it emerged from bankruptcy, having laid off some 17,000 workers, its private equity owners loaded it up with debt again. By early 2012, Hostess was in debt to the tune of $860 million. Despite its distress, its last chief executive was paid over $2.5 million a year.


So when further worker pay cuts of 27 to 32 percent were demanded to make up for all these corporate misdeeds, the union said, No way. The company then asked permission of the bankruptcy judge to liquidate—sell off its assets.


So the real story is not one of recalcitrant unions, but of private equity abuses. If this story faintly reminds you of something, it’s Bain Capital, the private equity firm that made Mitt Romney so rich.


Had Romney succeeded in his takeover bid for the White House, he would have been the perfect symbol of this debased era of American capitalism.


And if the man who beat Romney—President Barack Obama—wants to do something for America’s hard pressed workers, he could add to the list of tax reforms in the budget deal a reform of the loopholes that allow the private equity gang to take huge tax deductions for loading up a company with debt in order to take it over and then pay themselves exorbitant dividends that further strip the operating company of resources.


There is still a possibility that the judge in the case will not allow Hostess to be broken up. However, if the liquidation does go forward, fear not for the Twinkie. The gooey food has value as a brand and some company or other will surely buy it.


But fear for America’s workers. The way the private equity game is played, the financial engineers who keep creating these serial crises for their own enrichment will not be satisfied until the employees agree to work for nothing at all.

The American Prospect

Negotiations Resume















National Contract Negotiations Resume Monday


National UPS contract negotiations will be held in St. Petersburg, Florida next week from October 15-18.


The International Union turned over some opening bargaining proposals to UPS on Sept. 27. UPS did not submit bargaining proposals at that time.


The first page of the International Union’s bargaining demands includes a strongly-worded “Note on Harassment” and General Secretary-Treasurer and chief negotiator Ken Hall also issued a statement saying there will be no agreement reached unless harassment is dealt with to the union’s satisfaction.


But so far the IBT has offered few specific proposals on harassment. The Union’s opening proposal on Article 37, which covers excessive overtime, over-dispatch, over-supervision, 9.5 and 8-hour requests, was blank.


Click here to download and review the union’s opening proposals.


Click here to read more detailed coverage of the union’s opening bargaining proposals.


Will Union Proposals on SurePost Make UPS Deliver?


The International Union has told UPS that it will stop union cooperation with the controversial SurePost program unless the company negotiates agreements on the program as part of the new contract.


But the Company is already implementing one of the union’s only proposed changes, with the goal of boosting UPS profits, not protecting Teamsters.


The Union’s opening contract proposals calls for “a program to ensure that where package car drivers are delivering ground packages at the same address or to nearby addresses of SurePost packages, bargaining unit members will deliver the packages instead of the Post Office.” (Article 26, New Section 4)


But UPS already announced this change, three months ago and has started training package drivers.


Under a program called SurePost Redirect, UPS’s technology (PAS) will automatically redirect a post office SurePost package for delivery by the UPS driver when the company is delivering package to the same address or there are a multiple SurePost packages going to the same address on the same day.


The cost-saving purpose behind SurePost Redirect is laid out in a company presentation dated July 2012. It says point blank that the purpose of SurePost Redirect is to “Lower our cost by creating multi-package residential deliveries and reducing postage fees.” Click here to read it.

It is not clear why the IBT included a proposal for the already-implemented program in the Union’s bargaining demands.

SurePost ReDirect will save the company money and give package drivers additional boxes to deliver. But in and of itself, it will not do anything to ease over-dispatch and excessive overtime.


That will only happen through strengthening 9.5 protections and creating more driving jobs. That’s what our Union should be fighting for and making a condition of continued cooperation with SurePost.


Click here to read the full story.