What Brown Can Do TO You: Workers say that the company’s abrupt termination of Reyes. without due process is in violation of the “Innocent Until Proven Guilty” clause in workers’ contracts. After making their voices heard for 90 minutes, the employees returned to work and did their jobs.
UPS Fires 250 Drivers For Protesting Colleague’s Termination
February 26, 250 United Parcel service drivers organized a protest against a former colleague’s firing. Workers at the UPS facility in Maspeth, NY walked off the job last month to voice their disapproval with the termination of Jairo Reyes, a 24 veteran of the company for allegedly clocking in early.
Category Archives: Union
Give a click
In response, NYC elected officials and labor-community supporters are rallying behind the drivers. Political leaders are contacting UPS and a online support petition has been launched by community supporters. Click here to sign the online petition to support Local 804 members who face termination. On Feb. 26, UPS fired a package driver and long-time union activist and denied him his “Innocent Until Proven Guilty” rights under the Union contract. It was the final straw for UPS drivers in Maspeth, Queens who are fed up with 12-hour days, relentless harassment, an epidemic of workplace injuries and a company that walks all over the contract and grievance procedure. Teamster drivers walked off the job in protest. They returned to work after sending their message. Packages were delivered, the customers were serviced. Local 804, which represents the drivers, sat down with the company to try to resolve the dispute and address the underlying problems. Instead of reaching an agreement, the company retaliated against the 250 drivers and put all of them on notice of termination. The drivers remain on the job, but management claims it has the right to fire them at any time. The local is continuing to try to reach a negotiated solution. Teamsters everywhere stand in solidarity with the drivers in Maspeth. Click here to sign the online petition to support Local 804 members who face termination. For more information and to show your support, go to www.Teamsterslocal804.org
UPS has put 250 drivers in New York on notice of termination for standing up to harassment and unfair discipline.
Safeway to be Bought
Safeway Inc (SWY.N), the second-largest U.S. mainstream grocery store operator, said private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management would acquire the company in a deal valued at about $9.4 billion.
The offer price of $40 per share represents a premium of 1.3 percent to Safeway’s Thursday closing stock price of $39.47 on the New York Stock Exchange.
The deal combines Safeway with Cerberus’ Albertsons chain, creating a dominant grocery franchise on the West Coast. It also creates a grocery network of more than 2,400 stores and 250,000 employees.
No store closures are expected, according to the company.
Safeway shareholders will receive $32.50 per share in cash plus other distributions with a value of $3.65 per share.
Cerberus is a seasoned investor in the supermarket sector. Last March, a Cerberus-led investor group acquired a group of grocery chains from Supervalu Inc, including Albertsons and Jewel-Osco, for $3.3 billion.
Cerberus previously owned 650 Albertsons locations as a result of a 2006 deal under which the chain was acquired and its stores broken up between the private equity investor, Supervalu and CVS Caremark Corp.
Safeway has been in the hands of private equity before. KKR & Co LP (KKR.N) took Safeway private in 1986, and then sold its stake in 1999.
Safeway has been trying to streamline its business by selling off non-core units. Last year, it spun off its gift card provider, Blackhawk Network Holdings Inc (HAWK.O), into a separate publicly traded company.
It also sold off its Canadian business to the operator of Canadian retailer Sobeys for $5.8 billion in cash.
More recently, Safeway has revealed plans to leave the Chicago market by early this year. That announcement came after activist investor Jana Partners pressured the company to review strategic alternatives, including exiting weak markets.
Reuters first reported that Cerberus was exploring a buyout of Safeway last October.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) and Greenhill & Co Inc (GHL.N) advised Safeway on the transaction. Latham & Watkins LLP served as outside counsel.
Citigroup Inc (C.N), Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) and Credit Suisse AG (MLPN.P) advised Albertsons, Cerberus and its investor group.
(Reporting by Siddharth Cavale in Bangalore; Editing by Saumyadeb Chakrabarty and Jan Paschal)
Middle Class defeated in Tennessee
By heeding to misleading information from Grover Norquist and economic threats from their own elected representatives, plant workers were given the false impression that their unionizing would ultimately do them more harm than good. It seems that this technique is the only one they know how to do anymore.
This is the exact message that Republicans hoped they would hear and one they hammered home to keep 1,500 workers from making history and unionizing the first foreign carmaker in the South.
Thanks to a deliberate campaign of misinformation and underhanded techniques, Republicans have once again undermined American democracy and have forced their agenda on an unsuspecting population of decent, hard-working Americans.
Just 5%
GOOD ADVICE
How to protect members and enforce the contract when management is trying to derail the grievance procedure. The grievance procedure is supposed to protect members from unfair discipline and hold the company accountable to the contract. Management plays a variety of games to derail the grievance procedure and undermine our rights. Teamster Voice interviewed experienced Teamster stewards about common company The Fishing Expedition Management has the right to ask questions in an investigatory interview. But don’t fall for a fishing expedition. Members who are called into the office should have their steward with them and be prepped to keep their answers short and simple. If you’re asked about something and you don’t remember, just say so. The worst thing you can do is to make up a story and give management an excuse to try to discipline you for dishonesty. The Blowout Another common management tactic is to try to get you to lose your cool. They’ll put a member or steward down, shout or pepper us with ridiculous questions—whatever it takes to provoke a reaction they can use against us. Don’t give them the satisfaction—or the upper hand. Keep your cool and think twice before reacting to a statement or question. A member or steward can stop a meeting at any time and call a union caucus. Use the caucus to calm things down and keep on track. Shifting Burden of Proof In a grievance or disciplinary hearing, it’s up to management to prove an infraction and to justify the level of discipline. But a common trick is for management to try to shift burden of proof onto the employee. In some cases, management will even start out a meeting by saying, “Do you know why you’re here?” or “Give me one good reason why I shouldn’t fire you right now.” Other times, management is more subtle, but their goal is the same. Don’t let management turn the tables. In a disciplinary meeting, the shop steward or union representative should always insist that management present its case first. Make management answer the question, “Is that your entire case?” Then, use the Seven Steps of Just Cause to show that management failed to meet its burden of proof or that the discipline is too severe. Horse-Trading Management will frequently ask a steward or union rep to drop one grievance to get a settlement on another. This is a recipe for permanent surrender. Once you go down this road, management will never settle a grievance without trading it for something. Grievance settlements can involve compromise. But all grievances should be pursued on their individual merits. Side Issues Supervisors love to change the subject to get out of resolving an issue. Instead of discussing a grievance, they’ll bring up other problems or side issues. Redirect the conversation back to the issue at hand—as often as it takes: “We can discuss that later. Right now, we’re talking about this grievance.” Don’t take the bait and let management sidetrack the meeting. The Stall This is the most common management game—and the toughest to deal with. The right way to deal with company stalling depends on the situation. Sometimes group pressure is in order. If the problem affects a large number of members, file a group grievance. Make sure both the union and the company get a copy and follow up with your union rep so they know it’s a priority issue to members. A group of members can raise the issue together in the office—or at a union meeting—to make sure a grievance isn’t ignored. If the company is wasting your time by stalling, it may be time to take up some of management’s time. Under the National Labor Relations Act, and many Teamster contracts, the union has the right to file an information request and get documents from the employer that are pertinent to the union’s investigation of a grievance. Hitting management with a reasonable, but detailed, information request is one way to make management pay the price for not responding to a grievance. Publicity can have its place. Some stewards pass out grievance updates to keep members informed about the status of grievances—and to keep certain grievances in the public eye. Post a union countdown with the number of days that management has been ignoring the grievance. Hold a Grievance Update meeting in the break room. Have employees wear stickers that say, “Respect.” (Note: Your right to wear stickers or take other group actions depends on your employer and your contract. Contact your union rep or call TDU before taking group action.) Generally speaking, it’s easier to resolve grievances at a lower level in the grievance By using smart strategies, we can beat management at their grievance games.
Beating Management at the Grievance Game
tactics—and how stewards and members can beat management at the grievance game.
procedure. Take action early and target the people who have the ability to settle the issue. Don’t wait until a problem is tied up in arbitration or headed to a panel.
I Was One of Those

What They Don’t Show
They don’t show where the dog is, and at least she placed the packages nicely on the porch. She didn’t fling them from the street. I will admit she could have used the walk though.
UPS Freight Teamsters Overwhelmingly Approve New National Contract
Can the Boss Fire Me for facebook? (By TDU)
January 3, 2014: You’re online and so is your boss. What are the Do’s and Don’ts for staying out of trouble? Recent NLRB decisions protect the right of employees to complain about their job and their boss. But this does not mean that “anything goes”. Extreme personal attacks against bosses or co-workers may not be protected. The legal test is whether your post is so “egregious” that it makes your continued employment untenable. Posting racist or sexist comments about co-workers or management is not protected. Neither are violent threats. Criticizing your employer’s product, service or customers also may not be protected. The issue here is “disloyalty” particularly if you’re comments could hurt the company’s business and are not made as part of a labor dispute. Posting photos from when you’re on the job may not be protected. It’s one thing to post a photo of an unsafe working condition. It’s another to post a photo from the job that could hurt the employer’s business or image. The photos that recently appeared on Facebook of a prostitute in a UPS driver’s uniform are an extreme example. Social Media Policies Many employers are developing social media policies to establish rules for what kinds of posts can lead to discipline. The NLRB has thrown out social media policies that are so broad that they would prohibit or have a chilling affect on workers’ rights to discuss wages or working conditions. But other aspects of company social media policies have been upheld. Teamsters have contract protection above and beyond the law, and can use the grievance procedure to defend themselves from discipline if they are accused of violating company social media policy. How well that works depends on what you are posting, what company policies are, the union’s case and other factors. Think Before You Post There is no such thing as online privacy. You should assume your employer could eventually see anything you post online. If they don’t see your original post it could easily be forwarded, tweeted or reposted. Use common sense. Don’t post photos of your hunting trip if you called in sick. Never post when you’re on the clock, unless you are clearly on break. If you would have to deny saying it if you were confronted by management, then don’t post it. If you are discussing your working conditions with coworkers, you have legal protections. If you are posting comments about your employer that could be considered “egregious” or “disloyal” or if you’re posting work-related photos that have nothing to do with the union, TDU or improving wages and working conditions, then you may not be protected. Use social media to build Teamster unity and solidarity. Share information and have a laugh. But think before you post.
Teamsters are using Facebook to share information, sound off, and get organized. Facebook pages like Vote No on UPS Contract, No More Concessions!, Rebuild the IBT and others have helped Teamsters unite the rank-and-file.
Social media can be a good tool for building union solidarity and for having a laugh. But you’ve got to be smart about what you post.
If you’re on Facebook, chances are your boss is too. Employers are getting more aggressive about firing employees for posts they say cross the line.
Can these terminations stick? Arbitrators and the National Labor Relations Board are sorting out this new area of labor law.
In a series of decisions, the National Labor Relations Board has ruled that online conversations between coworkers on the internet have the same protections as face-to-face conversations. And these protections extend to complaints about management and supervisors.
That means Teamsters can use social media to criticize their employer, management or working conditions as long as they are engaged in “protected, concerted activity.” Concerted activity happens when: 1) employees discuss wages, hours, or working conditions or union or TDU activity together, or; 2) one or more employees voice concern on an issue that impacts other co-workers (safety, for example) or 3) one or more employees discuss lawful union activity.
“My Supervisor’s Crazy!”
In one case, a Teamster EMT in Connecticut was fired for insulting her supervisor in a Facebook post after the supervisor blocked her from getting assistance from a union rep. The EMT’s facebook post: “Love how the company allows a 17 to become a supervisor.”
17 is company lingo for a psychiatric patient. In a key fact in the case, other Teamsters posted supportive comments in response. Management took offense and fired the Teamster. The union filed an NLRB charge and the NLRB issued a complaint.
An NLRB lawyer told the press, “This is fairly straightforward. Whether it takes place on Facebook or at the water cooler, it was employees talking jointly about working conditions, in this case about their supervisor, and they have a right to do that.”
The case eventually settled, with the company agreeing to rewrite its social media policy and not to discipline or discharge employees for engaging in discussions about wages and other work issues.
Protections, But Not a Free Pass
